| From: "Patrick Cullinane" <patrick.cullinane@tiscali.co.uk>
View Contact Details To: adrian.marshall@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk CC: jamesonqc@no6.co.uk, rob.casey@switalskis.com, irene.brown@switalskis.com, Marian.Mahoney@hmps.gsi.gov.uk, strawj@parliament.uk, news@oldham-chronicle.co.uk, chris.benfield@ypn.co.uk, elaine.jinks@halifaxcourier.co.uk, a.taylor@the-sun.co.uk, paul.byrne@mirror.co.uk, editorial@examiner.co.uk, fogartyc@att.net, phillip.inman@guardian.co.uk, kizzykay@hotmail.co.uk, cp014d2774@blueyonder.co.uk, victoryusa@jail4judges.org, Steveharris11@aol.com, jhwilson@acay.com.au, ardeshir@mac.com, ladyl.cooper@btinternet.com, m.kellett@tiscali.co.uk, mayor@london.gov.uk, mail@europe-direct.cec.eu.int, Matthew.Blythe@itvwales.com, murphyp@parliament.uk, paperboy@nevis.scotsman.com, noelogara@yahoo.com, kimgold@btinternet.com, ms598@westyorkshire.pnn.police.uk, VisR@parliament.uk, p.fletcher@cchr.org.uk, NWexels-Riser@ohchr.org, paul.talbot-jenkins@virgin.net, maritimeinteriors@hotmail.co.uk, dccopen@emirates.net.ae, markcmetcalf@btinternet.com, colin@chwilson.demon.co.uk, Suzonfm@aol.com, mail@standyourground.co.uk, michaelryanresearch@hotmail.com, tomminogue@btinternet.com, meirionbowen@btopenworld.com, john.wallace@bbc.co.uk, newsdesk@bradford.newsquest.co.uk, yp.editor@ypn.co.uk, paul.horrocks@men-news.co.uk, public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk, which@which.co.uk, mail@ukip.org Subject: IBRG's Submission for our client Ronald Castree's trial: Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:24:29 -0000 IRISH IN BRITAIN REPRESENTATION GROUP (IBRG)
Working Against all the Odds!! <>>>>>>>>>>>>>><><<<<<<<<<<<<>
IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE
5 November 2007 FAO: Adrian Marshall, Court Manager and Rodney Jameson, Barrister Bradford Crown Court, Drake Street, Bradford BD1 1JA Tel: 01274 840 275
Mr. Marshall,
As the Court manager I bring to your immediate attention that my client Mr. Castree is being stitched-up by his legal team who were selected by the police.
Mr. Jameson’s following leading question to a prosecution ‘witness’ is the incontrovertible evidence that he is working for the other side to stitch-up Mr. Castree and pervert the course of justice: -
Asked yesterday by Rodney Jameson, QC for Castree, to confirm that she had told police Castree had removed his trousers, pressured her to touch him, pulled down her knickers and placed his hand on her bottom, the woman said: "Yes, that happened."
How did Mr. Castree manage to remove his trousers and hold on to a girl who was prepared to kick him and run away??? Did Mr. Castree remove his trousers with his shoes on??? If this nameless woman was brought in as a prosecution witness (to contaminate the jury) why wasn’t she questioned properly??? You can see the full story on the following link:
Halifax Courier Today - 01 November 2007 By Elaine Jinks Lesley Molseed murder trial: Woman tells of sex attack by Castree: http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/news/Lesley-Molseed-murder-trial-Woman.3435507.jp
This is further evidence that ‘Judge’ Openshaw is in on the conspiracy, as he said nothing about these unlawful leading questions
Like Stefan Kiszko they know my client Ronald Castree has NO case to answer, but they have him trapped in a massive conspiracy to fabricate a case against him like they did with Stefan Kiszko.
VERY IMPORTANT: My client Mr. Castree cannot explain how his DNA came to be found at the scene; therefore, when is Detective Chief Superintendent Max McLean going to be put on the stand and questioned thoroughly as to how Mr. Castree’s DNA came to be at the scene??? I am confident that the main witness in this case, Max McLean, will most certainly be able to shed some light into how Mr. Castree’s DNA came to be at the scene - when he takes the stand. Otherwise I will be calling for McLean to take a lie detector test, as he is a major player in the conspiracy to frame-up my client Mr. Castree.
Why has Max McLean NOT been called to the stand yet when he is to the Castree case what Dick Holland was to the Kiszko case?
Under Article 6 (3d) of the ECHR Mr. Castree is guaranteed an independent DNA expert: “to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him”
Therefore, Mr. Castree’s human rights have been violated as his legal team were selected by the police and are now working for, and with, the other side to pervert the course of justice. violated as his legal team who have been selected by the police are working for the other side him" aga
As Mr. Castree’s legal team are selling him down the river; therefore, please rush a copy of this correspondence in its entirety to my client Mr. Castree in order that he can bring it to the attention of the jury himself before they deliver another verdict (having been hoodwinked) like the Stefan Kiszko jury did.
As the court manager, are you aware that there is a massive conspiracy going on right now under your nose in Bradford Crown Court to pervert the course of justice? How can my client Mr. Castree get a fair hearing with such an abuse of process and everything being stage-managed like the Stefan Kiszko trial was??? Please acknowledge and address my correspondence of 31/10/07 ASAP.
As the court manager, it is imperative that you clarify that you have carried out my legitimate requests at your earliest convenience
Please acknowledge the safe receipt of this correspondence by return of email.
Thank you in advance for your immediate attention to this very, very serious matter
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Yours truthfully,
Patrick Cullinane, Legal Adviser / McKenzie Friend / Caseworker for the IBRG and Victim of HM Partnerships. <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> BACK TO MAIN WEB PAGE MOLSEED MURDER TRIAL
|